Aattam Movie Review: Anand Ekarshi's assault film generalises, rather than advocating accountability – IndiaTimes
Story: A theater group confronts an ethical quandary when a feminine actor experiences harassment. The movie delves into societal reflections and justice as 11 males grapple with the conviction of a co-artist
Overview: Anand Ekarshi’s debut movie addresses a longstanding social assemble that calls for motion past discourse. In a society the place gender is a minority concern, justice emerges as a alternative, relatively than an inherent proper. The compelling plot, that includes actors with a refreshing theater background, revolves round Anjali (Zarin Shihab), whose portrayal mirrors societal complexities.
Echoing society, the film options 12 males and a girl in a theater group, symbolising societal representatives. The narrative takes a critical flip when the feminine actor faces sexual harassment at a post-performance get together. As 11 males debate the conviction of a co-artist accused of assault, conflicts come up, prompting them to mirror on their morals.
Nevertheless, the movie falls wanting its creative goal by concluding ambiguously, using a Rashomon Impact. Reasonably than brazenly revealing the wrongdoer, it leaves the viewers in suspense. The film may have uncovered wrongdoers to society, adhering to actuality. Following Brecht’s alienation method would possibly unintentionally blame 11 different males, victims of patriarchy, perpetuating stereotypes.
Anjali’s catharsis addresses her trauma, however injustice is finished to the 11 males wrongly accused. The movie dangers reinforcing the ‘all males are rapists’ narrative, urging society to think about justice for all. The dialogue would stay unchanged even with 11 ladies, as the basis difficulty lies within the patriarchal framework and the angle related to the prevailing gender.
Drawing parallels with ’12 Indignant Males’, the movie tackles the urgent difficulty of #MeToo – Office harassment. Nevertheless, it deviates by emphasising obscure phrases like ‘tactile hallucinations,’ probably undermining actual assault claims. In an period demanding readability and accountability, the main focus ought to be on punishing culprits, not on generalisations.
Whereas discussing related matters is important for gender discourse, the movie’s creative stance might discover each supporters and critics. Artwork displays the artist, and various views contribute to the appreciation of any work.
– Anjana George
Adblock check (Why?)
