Leo movie review & film summary (2023) – Roger Ebert

Evaluations


“Leo,” a formulaic however satisfying Indian remake of “A Historical past of Violence,” each is and isn’t precisely what it seems like. You received’t be dissatisfied when you’re anticipating a boisterous, bloody, and bass-heavy motion musical a few espresso store proprietor who should shield his spouse and children from a paranoid drug supplier who claims that our household man is definitely a vicious ex-gangster. “Leo” is in any other case enterprise as ordinary, particularly when you see it for Tamil-language talking star Vijay, as many opening day ticketholders have already got.

Vijay’s previous couple of motion films have additionally served as overstuffed showcases for the chipmunk-cheeked main man. Vijay (“Beast,” “Varisu”), a former youngster actor, nonetheless doesn’t have a lot vary, however he doesn’t actually need to. He’s an motion star, and he seems good every time he’s dispatching scads of heavies along with his toes, fists, and varied mallets and blades. (Motion choreographer/stunt coordinator duo Abumani and Arivumani are credited with planning the film’s “Motion” below their “Anbariv” stage title.)

Vijay seems much less relaxed every time he tries to make a multidimensional character out of cafe proprietor/animal rescuer Parthiban, although his discomfort solely provides rigidity to his character’s id disaster. Reteaming with “Grasp” author/director Lokesh Kanagaraj, Vijay as soon as once more asserts his all-utility {qualifications}: he can wrestle a computer-generated hyena into submission, lead a warehouse stuffed with extras in a (largely nice) dance quantity, and even punch drug supplier Antony Das (Sanjay Dutt) by way of the air and right into a Land Rover.

Vijay’s drive to have an effect on any temper, model, or pose isn’t uncommon for such a preferred and charismatic marquee topper. Nonetheless, it’s putting to see Vijay, nonetheless eternally youthful regardless of his fastidiously stylized beard’s skunk streaks, play a personality who protests this a lot every time he’s confronted along with his killer fame. There’s even an anthemic music that, in a few scenes, means that “Mr. Leo Das is a badass.” So, who does Vijay assume he’s fooling?

Parthiban, fortunately, doesn’t should be plausible as something aside from a pretext for melodramatic fireworks. In character, Vijay seems convincing sufficient as a stern however loving dad to pouty pre-teen Mathi (Iyal) and well mannered adolescent Siddharth (Mathew Thomas), in addition to a doting however paternal husband to Sathya (Trisha). Some incidental particulars recommend that, within the city of Theog, Parthiban has a fame as “an odd individual, yeah, only a peace lovin’ soul,” as one music goes. Vijay’s nonetheless extra convincing when he’s inexplicably—however effectively!—dispatching wave after wave of violent baddies, all of whom both assume Parthiban’s really Leo Das, Antony’s estranged son, or just haven’t any clue who they’re coping with.

A great a part of what makes “Leo” so charming is that it’s already so acquainted, each for its something-for-everyone temper swings and its pulpy inventory plot. There’s no satirical edge right here, not like there was within the film model of “A Historical past of Violence.” However that’s to be anticipated in a automobile for a star who, when his character tries to win over his younger daughter, dances to the strains of “Thanmani Pookkun” from Tamil icon Prabhu’s 1995 romantic drama “Pasumpon.” In one other scene, we hear comparatively fashionable film music from the 2005 Vijay crime drama “Thirupaachi,” which additional hints at “Leo”’s cinematic lineage.

In case you already know Vijay, you in all probability additionally know what he’s able to. He reminds us in “Leo” throughout combat scenes, most of that are composed and reduce as dynamically as they’re choreographed. Vijay additionally flippantly checks viewers’ expectations every time Parthiban laments or protests that he couldn’t probably be Leo. Don’t take heed to that music, regardless of what number of instances it’s performed: how may you ever doubt that face?

As with many motion stars, Vijay’s presence creates its personal reality-defying requirements of normalcy. In a voiceover apart, he means that he (Parthiban) should imagine in himself first to be extra convincing to everybody else. That’s the character of such a film, whose dishevelled pacing would possibly nonetheless take a look at the endurance of anybody who simply desires to observe Vijay stab a hyena and possibly additionally gawk at Sanjay Dutt, I imply Antony Das, as he sacrifices a goat at his Satanic-looking shrine, full with a pentacle and large chicken of prey statue. Something could be regular when you’re already invested.

Vijay’s efficiency is usually a little bit too strained, particularly when Parthiban/Leo’s emotional outbursts need to deliver a scene to a brand new degree of emotional depth. Then once more, nonchalance doesn’t go well with Vijay. He appears to care an excessive amount of even when he, in character, casually blows away a number of extra non-descript baddies. In case you’re watching “Leo,” it needs to be to see Vijay exhibit in between animal assaults, automotive flips, and celeb cameos. And even when you don’t anticipate a lot from “Leo,” it nonetheless would possibly offer you precisely what you want.

In theaters now.

Simon Abrams
Simon Abrams

Simon Abrams is a local New Yorker and freelance movie critic whose work has been featured in The New York OccasionsVainness TruthfulThe Village Voice, and elsewhere.

Now taking part in

Movie Credit

Leo movie poster

Leo (2023)

Rated NR

163 minutes

Newest weblog posts

Feedback

Please allow JavaScript to view the feedback powered by Disqus.
feedback powered by Disqus

Adblock take a look at (Why?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Bollywood Divas Inspiring Fitness Goals

 17 Apr-2024 09:20 AM Written By:  Maya Rajbhar In at this time’s fast-paced world, priori…