Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody Review

If meaning grading these movies on a curve, then positive: watch I Wanna Dance With Any person as a result of Houston was an icon. Nevertheless, know that she deserves a greater film than simply one other youth-to-death guidelines with an habit detour, however no coherent sense of time or causality (the type that Baz Luhrmann might solely make work in Elvis by turning it right into a pop-fueled fever dream). Watch it as a result of Naomi Ackie shines within the title position, and watch it as a result of Lemmons manages to extract an oz or two of humanity from the script by Anthony McCarten — who, by the best way, was the offender behind not solely Rhapsody, however a slew of average-at-best award season biopics, from The Principle of Every part to The Darkest Hour. His subsequent movie on this mechanical style is about experimental pop artist Andy Warhol and neo-expressionist Jean-Michel Basquiat. It will probably’t assist however learn like a merciless joke the place the viewers is the punchline.

The longer you stare at I Wanna Dance With Any person, the extra you discover its “For Your Consideration: Greatest Image” watermark stamped throughout each scene. It begins in New Jersey in 1983, simply earlier than a 20-year-old Houston is found by file executives at a neighborhood efficiency — an occasion which we’re, in fact, handled to intimately. The movie’s preliminary scenes are amongst its strongest and most intimate, between the introduction of Houston’s mother and father, powerful Gospel singer Cissy (Tamara Tunie) and streetwise supervisor John (Clarke Peters), in addition to her first assembly with the boyish Robyn Crawford (Nafessa Williams), with whom Houston would have a relationship that will finally flip right into a friend-and-manager position. The script, nevertheless, not solely takes liberties with how they met — they had been each counselors at a summer time camp, however the film’s neighborhood meet-cute speeds issues alongside — however after they met as nicely. In actual life, it was 1980; Crawford was 19 whereas Houston was solely 16, however the movie avoids any potential entanglements and problems almost about their dynamic.

This pattern continues for a lot of its runtime. Points and complexities are swept below the rug no earlier than they come up, resulting in condensed scenes with little battle to behold. Hurdles like Houston and Crawford being noticed in public briefly come up, as do accusations levied in opposition to Houston’s music for not being “Black sufficient,” however the story finally ends up unconcerned with these vectors of queer and racial identification past mere passing mentions. Earlier than we all know it, any fights or eruptions over these issues, particularly between the main couple, are lengthy prior to now, having been resolved off-screen. The script’s modus operandi isn’t significant drama, however relatively, rushing ahead to tick off all of the predetermined occasions on its guidelines throughout its 146 minutes, regardless of Lemmons’ best efforts.

These efforts are often noticeable, no less than. Lemmons wasn’t the primary director hooked up to the undertaking, however she made for a promising addition because the filmmaker behind Harriet, her Harriet Tubman biopic (which she additionally co-wrote) that prevented the historic speedrun remedy by doubling as a story of religion and mysticism. I Wanna Dance With Any person has no such prospers, however Lemmons can also be a distinctly humanist filmmaker. So, whereas the film prices ahead from scene to scene with little resonance between occasions, the scenes themselves often reveal hidden dimensions to every character, given Lemmons’ lingering closeups.

That is helped vastly by the performances. They’re worthwhile throughout the board, between Williams’ silently pained conception of Crawford, Stanley Tucci as Clive Davis, Houston’s form file govt confidant — granted, Davis was one of many film’s producers, so he finally ends up valorized as a guardian angel — and Moonlight’s Ashton Sanders as an explosive, manipulative, and surprisingly layered Bobby Brown, Houston’s eventual husband. Tying all of it collectively is Ackie, a star of the best caliber, who paints her model of Houston not solely with nuance, however a radiant and alluring presence befitting of the music icon.

Nevertheless, the movie’s use of that grand iconography is often uninteresting. The title, as an example, is taken from one among Houston’s best songs, and whereas its inception within the story hints at a battle between soul and populism — between artistry and promoting out — there’s finally no such battle. Her work typically comes into existence with out which means or dramatization, as soon as once more adhering to the film’s guidelines construction. “After which this occurred. After which she recorded that tune. After which she gave this efficiency,” and so forth. There’s no soul to it.

Worse but, the story’s ending hinges on realizing the precise timeline and circumstances of Houston’s untimely passing, which it solely hints at obliquely. It’s too afraid to get its arms soiled in service of telling an precise story about an actual and messy individual, one with any type of company past the methods she could have been victimized — Houston’s property was intently concerned with the manufacturing — leading to a half-remembered recollection of sanded down occasions, relatively than rigorous, impactful drama.

The Greatest Film of 2022